Search

Text Color

Margin Size

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font

17.4: Contingency Tables

Last updated

Apr 23, 2022
Save as PDF
- 17.3: Testing Distribution Demonstration
- 17.5: 2 x 2 Simulation

$\newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} }$

$\newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}}$

$\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$ $\newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) $\newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$

$\newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$ $\newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$

$\newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$ $\newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}$

$\newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$

$\newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$

$\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$

$\newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$

$\newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}$

$\newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$

$\newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$

$\newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$

$\newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$

$\newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}$

$\newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$

$\newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$ $\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}$

$\newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow$

$\newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow$

$\newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} }$

$\newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}}$

$\newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}}$

$\newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}}$

$\newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}}$

$\newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} }$

$\newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}}$

$\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}$

$\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}$

$\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}$

$\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}$

$\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}$

$\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}$

$\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}$

$\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}$

$\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}$

$\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}$

$\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}$

$\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}$

$\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}$

$\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}$

$\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}$

$\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}$

$\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}$

$\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}$

$\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}$

$\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}$

$\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}$

$\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}$

$\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}$

$\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}$

$\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}$

$\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}$

$\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}$

$\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}$

$\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}$

$\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}$

$\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}$

$\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}$

$\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}$

$\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}$

$\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}$

$\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}$

$\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}$

$\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}$

$\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}$

$\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}$

$\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}$

$\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}$

$\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}$

$\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}$

$\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}$

$\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}$

$\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}$

$\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}$

$\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}$

$\newcommand{\lt}{<}$

$\newcommand{\gt}{>}$

$\newcommand{\amp}{&}$

$\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}$

Learning Objectives

State the null hypothesis tested concerning contingency tables
Compute expected cell frequencies
Compute Chi Square and $df$

This section shows how to use Chi Square to test the relationship between nominal variables for significance. For example, Table $\PageIndex{1}$ shows the data from the Mediterranean Diet and Health case study.

Table $\PageIndex{1}$ : Frequencies for Diet and Health Study
	Outcome
Diet	Cancers	Fatal Heart Disease	Non-Fatal Heart Disease	Healthy	Total
AHA	15	24	25	239	303
Mediterranean	7	14	8	273	302
Total	22	38	33	512	605

The question is whether there is a significant relationship between diet and outcome. The first step is to compute the expected frequency for each cell based on the assumption that there is no relationship. These expected frequencies are computed from the totals as follows. We begin by computing the expected frequency for the AHA Diet/Cancers combination. Note that $22/605$ subjects developed cancer. The proportion who developed cancer is therefore $0.0364$ . If there were no relationship between diet and outcome, then we would expect $0.0364$ of those on the AHA diet to develop cancer. Since $303$ subjects were on the AHA diet, we would expect $(0.0364)(303) = 11.02$ cancers on the AHA diet. Similarly, we would expect $(0.0364)(302) = 10.98$ cancers on the Mediterranean diet. In general, the expected frequency for a cell in the $i^{th}$ row and the $j^{th}$ column is equal to

$E_{i,j} = \frac{T_iT_j}{T}$

where $E_{i,j}$ is the expected frequency for cell $i,j$ , $T_i$ is the total for the $i^{th}$ row, $T_j$ is the total for the $j^{th}$ column, and $T$ is the total number of observations. For the AHA Diet/Cancers cell, $i = 1$ , $j = 1$ , $T_i = 303$ , $T_j = 22$ , and $T = 605$ . Table $\PageIndex{2}$ shows the expected frequencies (in parenthesis) for each cell in the experiment.

Table $\PageIndex{2}$ : Observed and Expected Frequencies for Diet and Health Study
	Outcome
Diet	Cancers	Fatal Heart Disease	Non-Fatal Heart Disease	Healthy	Total
AHA	15 (11.02)	24 (19.03)	25 (16.53)	239 (256.42)	303
Mediterranean	7 (10.98)	14 (18.97)	8 (16.47)	273 (255.58)	302
Total	22	38	33	512	605

The significance test is conducted by computing Chi Square as follows.

$\chi _{3}^{2} = \sum \frac{(E-O)^2}{E} = 16.55$

The degrees of freedom is equal to $(r-1)(c-1)$ , where r is the number of rows and $c$ is the number of columns. For this example, the degrees of freedom is $(2-1)(4-1) = 3$ . The Chi Square calculator can be used to determine that the probability value for a Chi Square of $16.55$ with three degrees of freedom is equal to $0.0009$ . Therefore, the null hypothesis of no relationship between diet and outcome can be rejected.

A key assumption of this Chi Square test is that each subject contributes data to only one cell. Therefore, the sum of all cell frequencies in the table must be the same as the number of subjects in the experiment. Consider an experiment in which each of $16$ subjects attempted two anagram problems. The data are shown in Table $\PageIndex{3}$ .

Table $\PageIndex{3}$ : Anagram Problem Data
	Anagram 1	Anagram 2
Solved	10	4
Did not Solve	6	12

It would not be valid to use the Chi Square test on these data since each subject contributed data to two cells: one cell based on their performance on $\text{Anagram 1}$ and one cell based on their performance on $\text{Anagram 2}$ . The total of the cell frequencies in the table is $32$ , but the total number of subjects is only $16$ .

The formula for Chi Square yields a statistic that is only approximately a Chi Square distribution. In order for the approximation to be adequate, the total number of subjects should be at least $20$ . Some authors claim that the correction for continuity should be used whenever an expected cell frequency is below $5$ . Research in statistics has shown that this practice is not advisable. For example, see:

Bradley, D. R., Bradley, T. D., McGrath, S. G., & Cutcomb, S. D. (1979) Type I error rate of the chi square test of independence in r x c tables that have small expected frequencies. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1200-1297.

The correction for continuity when applied to $2 \times 2$ contingency tables is called the Yates correction. The simulation 2 x 2 tables lets you explore the accuracy of the approximation and the value of this correction.

Support Center

How can we help?