Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/cancel.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Statistics LibreTexts

Search

  • Filter Results
  • Location
  • Classification
    • Article type
    • Author
    • Cover Page
    • License
    • Show TOC
    • Embed Jupyter
    • Transcluded
    • OER program or Publisher
    • Autonumber Section Headings
    • License Version
  • Include attachments
Searching in
About 2 results
  • https://stats.libretexts.org/Courses/Cerritos_College/Introduction_to_Statistics_with_R/19%3A_Bayesian_Statistics/19.06%3A_Bayesian_Analysis_of_Contingency_Tables
    Similarly, I didn’t bother to indicate that I ran the “joint multinomial” sampling plan, because I’m assuming that the method section of my write up would make clear how the experiment was designed. (...Similarly, I didn’t bother to indicate that I ran the “joint multinomial” sampling plan, because I’m assuming that the method section of my write up would make clear how the experiment was designed. (I might change my mind about that if the method section was ambiguous.) Neither did I bother indicating that this was a Bayesian test of association: if your reader can’t work that out from the fact that you’re reporting a Bayes factor and the fact that you’re citing the BayesFactor package for all…
  • https://stats.libretexts.org/Workbench/Learning_Statistics_with_SPSS_-_A_Tutorial_for_Psychology_Students_and_Other_Beginners/14%3A_Bayesian_Statistics/14.06%3A_Bayesian_Analysis_of_Contingency_Tables
    Similarly, I didn’t bother to indicate that I ran the “joint multinomial” sampling plan, because I’m assuming that the method section of my write up would make clear how the experiment was designed. (...Similarly, I didn’t bother to indicate that I ran the “joint multinomial” sampling plan, because I’m assuming that the method section of my write up would make clear how the experiment was designed. (I might change my mind about that if the method section was ambiguous.) Neither did I bother indicating that this was a Bayesian test of association: if your reader can’t work that out from the fact that you’re reporting a Bayes factor and the fact that you’re citing the BayesFactor package for all…

Support Center

How can we help?