Loading [MathJax]/extensions/mml2jax.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Statistics LibreTexts

Search

  • Filter Results
  • Location
    • There are no locations to filter by
  • Classification
    • Article type
    • Author
    • Cover Page
    • License
    • Show TOC
    • Embed Jupyter
    • Transcluded
    • OER program or Publisher
    • Autonumber Section Headings
    • License Version
  • Include attachments
Searching in
About 1 results
  • https://stats.libretexts.org/Workbench/Learning_Statistics_with_SPSS_-_A_Tutorial_for_Psychology_Students_and_Other_Beginners/13%3A_Factorial_ANOVA/13.01%3A__Factorial_ANOVA_1_-_Balanced_Designs_No_Interactions
    Back then I used the notation μ P to refer to the mean mood gain for the placebo group, with μ A and μ J corresponding to the group means for the two drugs, and the null hypothesis was μ P =μ A =μ J ....Back then I used the notation μ P to refer to the mean mood gain for the placebo group, with μ A and μ J corresponding to the group means for the two drugs, and the null hypothesis was μ P =μ A =μ J . So we’re actually talking about the same hypothesis: it’s just that the more complicated ANOVA requires more careful notation due to the presence of multiple grouping variables, so we’re now referring to this hypothesis as μ 1 . =μ 2 . =μ 3 . . However, as we’ll see shortly, although the hypothesi…

Support Center

How can we help?