Loading [MathJax]/extensions/mml2jax.js
Skip to main content
Library homepage
 

Text Color

Text Size

 

Margin Size

 

Font Type

Enable Dyslexic Font
Statistics LibreTexts

Search

  • Filter Results
  • Location
  • Classification
    • Article type
    • Author
    • Cover Page
    • License
    • Show TOC
    • Embed Jupyter
    • Transcluded
    • OER program or Publisher
    • Autonumber Section Headings
    • License Version
  • Include attachments
Searching in
About 4 results
  • https://stats.libretexts.org/Workbench/PSYC_2200%3A_Elementary_Statistics_for_Behavioral_and_Social_Science_(Oja)_WITHOUT_UNITS/16%3A_Chi-Square/16.01%3A_Introduction_to_Chi-Square/16.1.01%3A_Assumptions_of_the_Test(s)
    Opinions differ, but the default assumption seems to be that you generally would like to see all your expected frequencies larger than about 5, though for larger tables you would probably be okay if a...Opinions differ, but the default assumption seems to be that you generally would like to see all your expected frequencies larger than about 5, though for larger tables you would probably be okay if at least 80% of the the expected frequencies are above 5 and none of them are below 1 (meaning, no categories are empty).
  • https://stats.libretexts.org/Courses/Cerritos_College/Introduction_to_Statistics_with_R/10%3A_Categorical_Data_Analysis/10.05%3A_Assumptions_of_the_Test(s)
    Opinions differ, but the default assumption seems to be that you generally would like to see all your expected frequencies larger than about 5, though for larger tables you would probably be okay if a...Opinions differ, but the default assumption seems to be that you generally would like to see all your expected frequencies larger than about 5, though for larger tables you would probably be okay if at least 80% of the the expected frequencies are above 5 and none of them are below 1. For this example, the fact that the observations are non-independent (because the four cards that you pick will be related to each other) actually leads to the opposite effect… falsely retaining the null.
  • https://stats.libretexts.org/Workbench/Learning_Statistics_with_SPSS_-_A_Tutorial_for_Psychology_Students_and_Other_Beginners/09%3A_Categorical_Data_Analysis/9.05%3A_Assumptions_of_the_Test(s)
    Opinions differ, but the default assumption seems to be that you generally would like to see all your expected frequencies larger than about 5, though for larger tables you would probably be okay if a...Opinions differ, but the default assumption seems to be that you generally would like to see all your expected frequencies larger than about 5, though for larger tables you would probably be okay if at least 80% of the expected frequencies are above 5 and none of them are below 1. For this example, the fact that the observations are non-independent (because the four cards that you pick will be related to each other) actually leads to the opposite effect: falsely retaining the null.
  • https://stats.libretexts.org/Courses/Taft_College/PSYC_2200%3A_Elementary_Statistics_for_Behavioral_and_Social_Sciences_(Oja)/03%3A_Relationships/16%3A_Chi-Square/16.01%3A_Introduction_to_Chi-Square/16.1.01%3A_Assumptions_of_the_Test(s)
    Opinions differ, but the default assumption seems to be that you generally would like to see all your expected frequencies larger than about 5, though for larger tables you would probably be okay if a...Opinions differ, but the default assumption seems to be that you generally would like to see all your expected frequencies larger than about 5, though for larger tables you would probably be okay if at least 80% of the the expected frequencies are above 5 and none of them are below 1 (meaning, no categories are empty).

Support Center

How can we help?