Skip to main content
Statistics LibreTexts

15.4.1: Practice with Nutrition

  • Page ID
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Let’s try a second example using the same nutrition data set from fast food restaurants from as the chapter on correlations. If you grab your calculations and Sum of Products table from that practice with the nutrition data, you’ll be ahead of the game!


    When Dr. MO was on a low-carb diet, she noticed that things that were low in carbohydrates tended to be high in fat, and vice versa. Our prior analysis found a strong correlation between fat and carbs, but not in the direction that Dr. MO expected! Now, we will use our knowledge of this strong correlation to see if we can use the Total Fat in our sample chicken dishes from one fast food restaurant to predict the Total Carbs in those same dishes.

    Step 1: State the Hypotheses

    Because of trying to simplify regression, our hypotheses are still a little clunky, but hopefully you’ll see the value of regression analyses in the end.

    Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    What could be a research hypothesis for this scenario? State the research hypothesis in words and symbols.


    The research hypothesis should probably be something like, "There will be a positive slope in the regression line for Total Fat and Total Carbs."

    Symbols: \( \beta > 0 \)

    In other words, we’re trying to construct a statistically significant (as determined by an ANOVA) regression line equation that could use to predict Total Carbs from Total Fat.

    Example \(\PageIndex{2}\)

    What is the null hypothesis for this scenario? State the null hypothesis in words and symbols.


    The null hypothesis is that there is no relationship between Total Fat and Total Carbs, so "The slope in the regression line for Total Fat and Total Carbs will be zero." Neither variable can predict or explain the other variable.

    Symbols: \( \beta = 0 \)

    Step 2: Find the Critical Value

    Our critical value for regression will come from the Table of Critical Values of F, which shows that the appropriate critical value at p=0.05 is \(F_{Critical} (1, 11) = 4.84\).

    Step 3: Calculate the Test Statistic

    Okay, here’s where the tedious part starts! Use the data in Table \(\PageIndex{1}\) to start your calculations!

    Table \(\PageIndex{1}\): Raw Scores in Empty Sum of Products Table
    Total Fat Difference: Fat - Mean Fat Difference Squared Total Carbs Difference: Carbs - Mean Carbs Difference Squared Fat Diff * Carb Diff
    11     19      
    12     30      
    13     31      
    17     28      
    24     53      
    24     26      
    26     52      
    28     47      
    31     66      
    31     56      
    35     53      
    44     81      
    46     53      
    \(\sum = 342.00 \) \(\sum = ? \) \(\sum = ? \) \(\sum = 595.00 \) \(\sum = ? \) \(\sum = ? \) \(\sum = ? \)

    To start filling in the Table \(\PageIndex{1}\), we’ll need to find the means again for Total Fat and Total Carbs. Since we did that in the last chapter, let’s just put them in a Table \(\PageIndex{2}\).

    Table \(\PageIndex{2}\)- Descriptive Statistics of Nutrition Information
    Mean Standard Deviation N
    Total Fat 26.31 11.32 13
    Total Carb 45.77 17.89 13

    Now that we have the means, we can fill in the complete Sum of Products table.

    Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

    Fill in Table \(\PageIndex{1}\) by finding the differences of each score from that variable's mean, squaring the differences, multiplying them, then finding the sums of each of these.


    Completed Sum of Products table:

    Table \(\PageIndex{3}\): Completed Sum of Products Table
    Total Fat Difference: Fat - Mean Fat Difference Squared Total Carbs Difference: Carbs - Mean Carbs Difference Squared Fat Diff * Carb Diff
    11 -15.31 234.40 19 -26.77 716.63 409.85
    12 -14.31 204.78 30 -15.77 248.69 225.67
    13 -13.31 177.16 31 -14.77 218.15 196.59
    17 -9.31 86.68 28 -17.77 315.77 165.44
    24 -2.31 5.34 53 7.23 52.27 -16.70
    24 -2.31 5.34 26 -19.77 390.85 45.67
    26 -0.31 0.10 52 6.23 38.81 -1.93
    28 1.69 2.86 47 1.23 1.51 2.08
    31 4.69 22.00 66 20.23 409.25 94.88
    31 4.69 22.00 56 10.23 104.65 47.98
    35 8.69 75.52 53 7.23 52.27 62.83
    44 17.69 312.94 81 35.23 1241.15 623.22
    46 19.69 387.70 53 7.23 52.27 142.36
    \(\sum = 342.00\) \(\sum = 0.00\) \(\sum = 1536.77\) \(\sum = 595.00\) \(\sum = -0.01\) \(\sum = 3842.31\)

    \(\sum = 1997.92\)

    We can do a computation check to see if our difference scores each score minus the mean for that variable) were calculated correctly by seeing if they each sum to nearly zero, which they do; yay! We could use the sum of those squares to calculate the standard deviation for each variable, but that was already provided in Table \(\PageIndex{2}\).

    So, we have what we need to complete this activity. But what is this activity? Ultimately, our goal is to predict Total Carbs using Total Fat with a regression line equation (\(\widehat{y} = a + b\text{x}\)). So, we need to find the slope (b) and the intercept (a).

    Here’s the formula for slope:

    \[\mathrm{b}=\dfrac{(Diff_{x} \times Diff_{y})}{Diff_{x}^2} = \dfrac{(Diff_{F} \times Diff_{C})}{Diff_{F}^2}\nonumber \]

    What this equation is telling us to do is pretty simple since we have the Sum of Products table filled out.

    Example \(\PageIndex{3}\)

    Calculate the slope for this scenario.


    \[\mathrm{b}= \dfrac{1997.92}{1539.77} = 1.30 \nonumber \]

    The result means that as Total Fat (\(X\)) changes by 1 unit, Total Carb (\(Y\)) will change by 1.30. This is a positive relation.

    Next, we use this slope (b = 1.30), along with the means of each variable, to compute the intercept:

    \[a =\overline{X_y} - (b \times \overline{X_x}) = \overline{X_C} - (b \times \overline{X_F}) \nonumber \]

    Example \(\PageIndex{4}\)

    Using the means and the slope (b) that we just calculated, calculate the intercept (a).


    \[a =45.77 - (1.30 * 26.31) \nonumber \]

    \[a =45.77 - (34.20) \nonumber \]

    \[a =11.57 \nonumber \]

    Now that we have all of our parameters estimated, we can give the full equation for our line of best fit: \(\widehat{y} = a + b\text{x}\)

    Example \(\PageIndex{5}\)

    Construct the regression line equation for to predict Total Carbs (\(\widehat{y}).


    \[\widehat{y} = 11.57 + 1.30\text{x} \nonumber \]

    Let’s look at that regression line on our scatterplot generated using statistical software.

    Scatterplot with fat and carbs data showing a strong correlation going up and to the right.  A regression line runs through the dots.
    Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): Scatterplot and Regression Line of Fast Food Nutrition Data (CC-BY-SA Michelle Oja via data from

    It looks like our regression line is a pretty good match for our data! But to make sure, let’s make sure that we have a statistically significant model using this regression line. Table \(\PageIndex{4}\) shows an ANOVA Summary Table with the Sum of Squares already included from an analysis conducted using statistical software.

    Table \(\PageIndex{4}\): ANOVA Summary Table with SS
    Source \(SS\) \(df\) \(MS\) \(F\)
    Model 1038.88      
    Error 497.89      
    Example \(\PageIndex{6}\)

    Fill in the rest of the ANOVA Summary Table from Table \(\PageIndex{4}\).


    Table \(\PageIndex{5}\): ANOVA Summary Table
    Source \(SS\) \(df\) \(MS\) \(F\)
    Model 1038.88 1 \(MS_M = \dfrac{SS_M}{df_M} = \dfrac{1038.88}{1} = 1038.88 \) \(F = \dfrac{MS_M}{MS_E} = \dfrac{1038.88}{45.26} = 22.95\)
    Error 497.889 \(N - 2 = 13 - 2 = 11\) \(MS_E = \dfrac{SS_E}{df_E} = \dfrac{497.89}{11} = 45.26 \) N/A
    Total 173.99 \(N - 1 = 13 - 1 = 14\) N/A N/A

    We can do a computation check to make sure that our Degrees of Freedom are correct since the sum of the Model's df and the Error's df should equal the Total df. And since 1 + 11 = 12, we're on the right track.

    This gives us an obtained \(F\) statistic of 22.95, which we will now use to test our hypothesis.

    Step 4: Make the Decision

    We now have everything we need to make our final hypothesis testing decision. Our calculated test statistic was \(F_{Calc} = 22.95\) and our critical value was \(F_{Crit} = 4.84\). Since our calculated test statistic is greater than our critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis because this is still true:


    (Critical \(<\) Calculated) \(=\) Reject null \(=\) There is a linear relationship. \(= p<.05 \)

    (Critical \(>\) Calculated) \(=\) Retain null \(=\) There is not a linear relationship. \(= p>.05\)

    Write-Up: Reporting the Results

    Let’s use the four components needed for reporting results to organize our conclusions so far.

    Example \(\PageIndex{7}\)

    Add text hereDescribe the four components for reporting results for this scenario in complete sentences.


    1. For our sample of 13 chicken dishes from one fast food restaurant, the average Total Fat was 26.31 and the average Total Carb was 45.77.
    2. The research hypothesis was that here will be a positive slope in the regression line for Total Fat and Total Carbs.
    3. The ANOVA results were F(1,11)=22.95, p<.05, showing that our regression line could be used to make predictions.
    4. The results are statistically significant, and the positive Sum or Products shows a positive slope so the research hypothesis is supported.

    Using Regression

    But really, what does that even mean? How is any of that useful? Well, it turns out that because our regression equation was found to be statistically significant, we can use it to make predictions.

    Example \(\PageIndex{8}\)

    Imagine that you went to the fast food restaurant that this data is from, and they had a new chicken meal with even lower fat than anything currently on their menu (10 grams of Total Fat). Use the regression line equation to estimate how many Total Carbs would be in this new meal. Don’t forget to end with a complete sentence.


    With this regression line equation:

    \[\widehat{y} = 11.57 + 1.30\text{x} \nonumber \]

    We would replace the “x” placeholder with our new value of 10 grams of Total Fat to find:

    \[\widehat{y} = 11.57 + (1.30 * 10) \nonumber \]

    \[\widehat{y} = 11.57 + (13.00) \nonumber \]

    \[\widehat{y} = 24.57 \nonumber \]

    The estimated Total Carbs of this new chicken meal with 10 Total Fat is 24.57 grams of carbohydrates.

    That’s not what we hypothesized, but this is the whole point of regression, to use a variable (or variables) that we have to predict variables that we don’t have. Knowing this, let’s try a final conclusion.

    In our sample of 13 chicken dishes from one fast food restaurant, we found the average Total Fat to be 26.31 and the average Total Carbs to be 45.77. This data was used to create a statistically significant regression equation (F(1, 11)=22.95, p<.05), which supports the research hypothesis that there would be a positive slope. If the fast food restaurant came out with a new low-fat chicken dish (10 grams of fat), we can predict that the Total Carbs of that dish would be 24.57 grams.

    Accuracy in Prediction

    Wanna know how accurate that prediction is? Square root the Mean Square of the Error term from the ANOVA Summary Table. As this formula shows, this is similar to the standard deviation formula because it follows the same logic:

    \[S_{(Y-\widehat{Y})}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sum(Y-\widehat{Y})^{2}}{N-2}} \nonumber \]

    But since we have the MS of the Error in Table \(\PageIndex{5}\), we can just square root 42.26:

    \[s_{(Y-\widehat{Y})}=\sqrt{MS_E} = \sqrt{45.26} = 6.73 \nonumber\]

    So on average, our predictions will be almost 7 (6.73) grams away from the actual values. There are no specific cutoffs or guidelines for how big our standard error of the estimate can or should be. What do you think? Is a variation around the prediction of 7 grams of carbohydrates precise enough? There’s no right or wrong answer, just your thoughts and opinion!

    Hopefully you saw how regression equations can be useful for making predictions about values that we don’t have yet based on samples of two variables that we do already have data for. In the next section, you’ll learn how we can combine multiple variables to predict one variable.

    Contributors and Attributions

    This page titled 15.4.1: Practice with Nutrition is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Michelle Oja.

    • Was this article helpful?